Form ADV Part 2A Form CRS Relationship Summary
Investment Strategy

The Demographic Growth Thesis

Three structural demographic forces are reshaping consumption, capital formation, and demand across U.S. households. We identify the equities positioned to benefit from this growth and hold them across the full duration of the shift.

Our Approach
The Thesis

Demographic Shifts Are Structural.

A person born in 1960 will turn 65 in 2025. The demands that person will place on health care, financial services, and consumption patterns over the following two decades are calculable, and the equities positioned to benefit from that demand growth are identifiable today.

Our strategy is to identify these structural shifts before the consensus recognizes them as investment themes, and to build high conviction positions around those shifts.

Population data from the Census Bureau and Social Security Administration is publicly available. The opportunity lies in the conviction to act on a decade-long thesis before consensus catches up.

The Market Misprices Time.

Capital markets are built to accurately price the next quarter. Analyst models rarely extend beyond a five-year horizon, and the further out a projection runs, the more aggressively it is discounted. This is rational for most investing, but it is not rational when the underlying driver of returns is a demographic shift that compounds over a generation.

Mercury was founded on a single observation: demographic trends are among the most predictable forces in economics, yet the market, obsessed with near-term results, systematically fails to price them. That failure creates durable opportunities for patient investors to generate superior long-run returns.

Typical sell-side models often have a five-year explicit forecast period. Demographic effects on earnings accumulate over ten to twenty years.

Cost Efficiency Compounds.

Most performance is measured gross of taxes and transaction costs. For a taxable investor, those deductions are meaningful and they compound over time. A portfolio with high annual turnover generates realized gains that add to the tax burden year over year. Mercury's strategy, by holding positions until the thesis resolves, defers that liability and reduces transaction drag. The result is a structural cost advantage that accrues to the investor quietly, over time, and regardless of market conditions.

Low annual turnover is a consequence of long-horizon thesis-driven investing.
The Three Structural Shifts

Three generational forces the market has not fully priced

Each shift creates durable demand that compounds over a decade. All three are structural in origin, predictable from population data available today.

I Shift I

Baby Boomers & Increasing Affluence

Born between 1946 and 1964 the baby boom represents many dramatic changes from previous generations. Educational achievement among boomers was much greater than what was normal, leading to greater income opportunities. Additionally, two income households became the norm. The peak population years of the boom are now moving through the age range associated with peak net worth. Household net worth for households within this age range is at an all time high. Health care, wealth management, and income-generating assets face structural demand that will persist for two decades, regardless of short-term GDP or interest rate movements.

II Shift II

Neo-Boomers

Born between 1987 and 2009 this cohort outnumbers their parents, the baby boomers. Due to their parents’ historical levels of educational attainment and preference for two-income households, this boomlet has enjoyed a lifestyle unimaginable to the majority of the children before them, and will quite probably be the best educated, greatest consumer generation yet. Right now this generation is driving (both the price of gas and college education). While the market has priced the quarter, it has not priced the decade ahead during which time this cohort will reach peak earning and spending maturity simultaneously.

III Shift III

The Excluded Middle

The cohort between the Baby Boomers and Neo-Boomers is navigating peak earning years while simultaneously funding college tuition, elder care, and their own retirement, creating a structural multi-obligation position no previous generation has faced at this scale. The financial services demand this creates is recurring and underpriced. They are also entering an age range historically associated with the greatest rate of starting a new business. People in this age range are most likely to experience a dramatic increase in net worth associated with a successful business and career growth.

How we translate the thesis into a portfolio
Structural Inefficiency

The Market Consistently Underweights the Long Horizon.

The demographic shifts Mercury invests around operate on timescales that the market, oriented as it is around quarterly results and annual performance reviews, tends to systematically underprice. That gap between the duration of the opportunity and the horizon the market is focused on is where we invest, and the same structural pressures that create the mispricing also ensure it persists long enough to be worth acting on.

1.6% Average annual portfolio turnover — a direct consequence of holding positions across the full duration of a demographic thesis.
23yr Composite track record beginning January 2002, through multiple market cycles and regime changes.
86.2% Active share versus the S&P 500 — high differentiation from the index, by design.

Long-horizon investing rewards the patience to hold through full market cycles.

Our time horizon is measured in years. If that matches how you think about capital, we should talk.

Our Approach