The Demographic Growth Thesis

Three structural demographic forces are reshaping consumption, capital formation, and demand across U.S. households. We identify and take positions in the equities disproportionately positioned to benefit from this growth .

Our Approach

Demographics

We track three demographic forces, and base our investments on how they will shape the economy over the next decade. Using the forces as a lens, we identify reliable and durable demand trends ahead of their peaks.

I Force I

Baby Boomers & Increasing Affluence

Born between 1946 and 1964, the baby boom differed from the generations before it in several ways. Educational achievement was far higher, which widened income opportunities, and two-income households became the norm. The peak population years of the boom are now moving through the age range associated with peak net worth, and net worth for this group is at an all-time high. Health care, wealth management, and income-generating assets face structural demand that will persist for two decades, regardless of short-term GDP or interest rate movements.

II Force II

Neo-Boomers

Born between 1987 and 2009, this cohort outnumbers the Baby Boomers who preceded it. Thanks to their parents' higher educational attainment and two-income households, they have grown up with a standard of living earlier generations did not, and will likely be the best-educated, highest-spending generation yet. The market has priced their spending today. It has not priced the decade ahead, when this cohort reaches peak earning and spending at the same time.

III Force III

The Excluded Middle

The cohort between the Baby Boomers and Neo-Boomers is in its peak earning years, funding college tuition, elder care, and retirement at the same time. No previous generation has carried this many obligations at once, and the financial-services demand it creates is recurring and underpriced. This is also the age when people most often start a business, the stage where a successful venture or career step can raise net worth sharply.

Four stages from thesis to portfolio

Each stage applies a distinct discipline. Together they produce a portfolio whose holdings can be traced directly back to a specific demographic argument.

Stage 01

Demographic Mapping

We begin with population data including Census Bureau projections, Social Security Administration cohort analysis, and labor force participation trends. We identify which demographic forces are accelerating, which are plateauing, and where the market has not yet priced the decade ahead.

Stage 02

Sector & Industry Selection

From our ongoing demographic mapping process, we identify the sectors and industries where structural demand is both large and durable. We apply a filter: the demand must be demographic in origin. Education, financial services, housing, and consumption categories where cohort size drives volume are recurring areas of focus.

Stage 03

Security Selection

Within targeted sectors, we conduct fundamental analysis on individual companies: business model, competitive moat, balance sheet, management quality, and earnings leverage to the specific demographic driver. A strong demographic tailwind is necessary but not sufficient. The company must also be positioned to translate that tailwind into earnings at an acceptable valuation.

Stage 04

Portfolio Construction

Approved positions are sized based on conviction, valuation, and contribution to portfolio-level risk. We manage concentration deliberately; it must be high enough that our best ideas matter, but not so high that a single error is disqualifying. No single position exceeds 10% of the portfolio at cost. Sector exposures are monitored against the demographic thesis.

Long-horizon investing rewards the patience to hold through full market cycles.

Our time horizon is measured in years. If that matches how you think about capital, we should talk.

Our Approach